Search powered by Google. Results may include advertisements.

Is ChatGPT making us mentally lazy? How to stay smart in the AI era

Claude Shannon, one of the fathers of AI, once wrote rather disparagingly: “I visualise a time when we will be to robots what dogs are to humans, and I’m rooting for the machines.” As we enter the age of AI — arguably, the most powerful technology of our times, many of us fear that this prophecy is coming true.It is

New Delhi

Claude Shannon, one of the fathers of AI, once wrote rather disparagingly: “I visualise a time when we will be to robots what dogs are to humans, and I’m rooting for the machines.” Many of us worry that this prophecy is coming true as we enter the era of artificial intelligence (AI), which is arguably the most potent technology available today.

Strong AI models, such as ChatGPT, are capable of producing intricate essays, poetry, and images; Google's Veo creates movies of cinematic quality; and Deep Research agents generate research reports at the touch of a button. Our innate human abilities of thinking, creating, and reasoning seem to be now duplicated, sometimes surpassed, by AI.

?

A recent study called "Your Brain on ChatGPT" from the MIT Media Lab seemed to confirm this. It suggested that while AI tools like ChatGPT help us write faster, they may be making our minds slower. Researchers discovered that individuals who used ChatGPT for essay writing showed up to 55% lower brain activity, as measured by EEG signals, compared to those who wrote without assistance during a four-month, painstakingly conducted experiment with 54 participants.

As if this weren't concerning enough, when ChatGPT users were asked to write independently in a subsequent session, their brains continued to be less engaged than those of individuals without AI (referred to as "brain-only" participants in the study). Memory also suffered — only 20% could recall what they had written, and 16% even denied authorship of their own text! The message seemed to be very clear: while it might be efficient to outsource thinking to machines, doing so runs the risk of compromising our ability to think deeply, retain information, and take ownership of ideas.

?

The co-founder of AI & Beyond, Jaspreet Bindra, claims that technology has always transformed us and that we have witnessed this narrative numerous times. You used to be able to remember everyone's phone number, but these days you can hardly remember your family's, if at all. If you couldn't recall roads, lanes, and routes, you asked someone or looked at a paper map. These days, Google and other map apps take care of that for us. Facebook reminds us of people's birthdays, and email responses come to us on their own, saving us even a small amount of thought. Will we even remember how to drive when self-driving cars become commonplace, or will we just relax in our seats while they drive us to our destination?

Jonathan Haidt, in his ‘The Anxious Generation,’ points out how smartphones radically reshaped childhood.

??Unstructured outdoor play gave way to scrolling, and social bonds turned into notifications. Attention deficits, loneliness, and anxiety among teenagers all increased. From calculators diminishing our mental arithmetic, to GPS weakening our spatial memory, every tool we invent alters us — subtly or drastically.

“Do we shape our tools, or do our tools shape us?” is a quote commonly misattributed to Marshall McLuhan, but this question is hauntingly relevant in the age of AI. What happens to our ability to think, reflect, reason, and learn if we allow machines to think? Children are particularly concerned about this, especially in India. For one, India has the highest usage of ChatGPT globally. Most of it is by children and young adults, who are turning into passive consumers of AI-generated knowledge.

Imagine a 16-year-old using ChatGPT to write a history essay. The output might be near-perfect, but what has she actually learned? The MIT study suggests — very little. Without effortful recall or critical thinking, she might not retain concepts, nor build the muscle of articulation. With exams still based on memory and original expression, and careers requiring problem-solving, this is a silent but real risk.

However, the true questions are not whether the study is accurate or overstated, or whether AI is making us less intelligent, but rather what we can do about it. We definitely need some guardrails and precautions, and we need to start building them now. I believe that we should teach ourselves and our children to:

Ask the right questions: As answers become commodities, asking the right questions will be the differentiator. We must reconsider our pedagogy and educational system in order to revive this special human ability of curiosity. Intelligence is not just about answers. It has to do with having the guts to consider, question, and produce.

Turn homework and classwork around: Set aside class time for "brain-only" exercises like journaling, debating, and mental math. Homework can be about using AI tools to learn what will be discussed in class the next day.

AI usage guidelines: Schools should establish explicit guidelines for when and how AI can be used, just as they do for smartphone use.

Teacher-AI synergy: Train educators to use AI as a co-teacher, and not a crutch. AI should be viewed as augmented intelligence rather than an alternative.

Make everyone AI literate above all else: Knowing how to use AI effectively is the new essential skill of our time, much like reading, writing, and math were fundamental in the digital age. AI literacy is more than just knowing prompts.

It means understanding when to use AI, and when not to; how to verify AI output for accuracy, bias, and logic; how to collaborate with AI without losing your own voice, and how to maintain cognitive and ethical agency in the age of intelligent machines. Just as we once taught ‘reading, writing, adding, multiplying,’ we must now teach ‘thinking, prompting, questioning, verifying.’

Humans are adaptable, as history demonstrates. Calculators did not end arithmetic, the printing press did not destroy memory, and smartphones did not eliminate communication. We evolved with them—sometimes clumsily, but always creatively. Today, with AI, the challenge is deeper because it imitates human cognition.

In fact, human intelligence and connection will be even more valued as AI pushes us to higher levels of creativity and cognition. Take chess: a computer defeated Gary Kasparov in chess back in 1997; since then, a computer or AI can defeat any chess champion a hundred times out of a hundred. However, as millions of people watch D Gukesh's matches with Magnus Carlsen, human "brains-only" chess has grown significantly in popularity. Therefore, we can become wiser rather than weaker if we develop AI literacy, put the proper safeguards in place, and teach ourselves and our kids to think with AI but not through it.

ALSO READ:




More Post

Salvation in Christianity Explained: The Concept That Defines the Faith (And Confuses Everyone)

Description: Understand the concept of salvation in Christianity—what it means, how different denominations interpret it, and why Christians believe it matters more than anything else.


Let me tell you about the moment I realized I'd been hearing the word "salvation" my entire life without actually understanding what it meant.

I knew it was important. Obviously. Churches talk about it constantly. "Are you saved?" bumper stickers ask. Preachers say it's the whole point of Christianity. Songs proclaim being "saved by grace." People give testimonies about when they "got saved."

But when I tried to explain what salvation actually is—not the church language version, but what the concept genuinely means—I sounded like someone trying to explain quantum physics using only hand gestures and increasingly desperate metaphors.

"It's like... being rescued. But from sin? Which is... bad things you do? And you're saved by... believing in Jesus? Who died for... your sins? So God can... forgive you?"

Technically accurate. Explains approximately nothing.

What is salvation in Christianity sounds like it should have a simple answer. It doesn't. Or rather, the core concept is straightforward—being rescued from sin and its consequences through Jesus Christ—but the theological depth, denominational disagreements, and practical implications are anything but simple.

Christian salvation explained requires understanding sin, grace, faith, works, predestination, free will, heaven, hell, and about seventeen other theological concepts that Christians have debated for two millennia without reaching complete consensus.

How to be saved according to the Bible gets different answers depending on which verses you emphasize and which theological tradition interprets them.

So let me walk you through salvation in Christian theology—what Christians actually believe about being saved, why it matters to them more than anything else, how different traditions understand it differently, and what this means practically for those who believe it.

Whether you're Christian trying to understand your own faith more deeply, from another tradition curious about Christianity's core claim, or entirely secular but wanting to understand what billions of people actually believe, this matters.

Because salvation isn't a side doctrine in Christianity.

It's the whole point.

What Salvation Actually Means (The Core Concept)

Salvation definition Christianity stripped to essentials:

The Problem: Separation from God

Christian theology teaches: Humanity is separated from God because of sin.

Sin: Not just "bad things you do" but fundamental rebellion against God, a broken relationship, a state of being separated from God's presence.

The consequence: Death (physical and spiritual), separation from God eternally, inability to fix the problem through human effort.

The human condition: Everyone has sinned. Everyone faces this separation. No one can bridge the gap themselves through good behavior, religious ritual, or moral improvement.

Romans 3:23: "For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God."

Romans 6:23: "For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord."

The Solution: Jesus Christ

God's response: Rather than leaving humanity in separation, God acted to restore the relationship.

The incarnation: God became human in Jesus Christ.

The crucifixion: Jesus died, taking on himself the penalty for humanity's sin.

The resurrection: Jesus rose from death, demonstrating victory over sin and death.

The offer: Through Jesus, the separation is bridged. Relationship with God is restored. The penalty is paid.

John 3:16: "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life."

What Being "Saved" Means

Rescued from: Sin's penalty (eternal separation from God), sin's power (bondage to sinful patterns), and eventually sin's presence (complete transformation).

Restored to: Right relationship with God, forgiveness, reconciliation, eternal life with God.

Not just "going to heaven when you die": Though that's included, salvation is also about present transformation, new identity, and restored relationship beginning now.

A gift, not achievement: Christianity insists salvation is received, not earned. This distinguishes it from works-based religious systems.

The Mechanism: How Salvation Works

How does salvation work in Christian theology:

Grace: The Foundation

Grace defined: God's unmerited favor. Getting what you don't deserve (forgiveness, relationship, salvation) rather than what you do deserve (judgment, separation).

Ephesians 2:8-9: "For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works, so that no one can boast."

Why grace matters: Removes human ability to earn salvation. Levels the playing field—everyone equally dependent on God's gift.

The offense: This offends human pride. People want to earn salvation, prove worthiness. Christianity says you can't, and that's the point.

Faith: The Means

Faith defined: Trust in Jesus Christ, reliance on his work rather than your own, belief that his death and resurrection accomplish what you cannot.

Not just intellectual agreement: Believing God exists isn't enough. Trusting him is.

Personal trust: Not generic belief but specific trust in Jesus for your salvation.

Romans 10:9: "If you declare with your mouth, 'Jesus is Lord,' and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved."

Repentance: The Response

Repentance defined: Turning away from sin, changing direction, acknowledging need for forgiveness.

Not earning salvation: Repentance doesn't make you worthy. It's acknowledging unworthiness and turning to God anyway.

Genuine transformation: True faith produces change. Not perfection, but directional shift.

Acts 3:19: "Repent, then, and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped out."

The Role of Jesus's Death and Resurrection

Why the cross was necessary: Christian theology teaches God is both perfectly loving and perfectly just. Love desires forgiveness; justice requires sin's penalty be paid.

The substitution: Jesus takes the penalty (death, separation) that humanity deserved.

The victory: Resurrection demonstrates death is defeated, sin's power is broken, salvation is accomplished.

Not cosmic child abuse: God didn't punish Jesus to satisfy anger. In Christian theology, God in Christ suffered to satisfy justice while extending mercy.

Different Views on Salvation (Because Christians Disagree)

Denominational views on salvation vary significantly:

Catholic Teaching

Faith and works cooperate: Salvation is by grace through faith, but works are necessary evidence and outworking of faith.

Sacraments matter: Baptism initiates salvation, other sacraments sustain it.

Process of sanctification: Salvation isn't a one-time event but ongoing process of growing in holiness.

Mortal vs. venial sins: Serious sins can sever salvation relationship; requires confession and penance to restore.

Purgatory: Final purification before entering God's presence for those who die in grace but aren't fully sanctified.

Mary and saints: Can intercede on behalf of believers.

Protestant (Evangelical) Teaching

Faith alone (sola fide): Salvation is by faith alone, not faith plus works. Works are evidence, not cause.

One-time conversion: Often emphasis on specific moment of "accepting Christ" or "being born again."

Assurance possible: You can know you're saved based on faith in God's promise.

Direct access to God: No need for priestly mediation or saints' intercession.

Scripture alone (sola scriptura): Bible is sufficient authority on salvation, not church tradition.

Eternal security debated: Some believe "once saved, always saved." Others believe salvation can be lost through abandoning faith.

Buddhist Morality and Philosophies The Way to Kindness and Understanding

Buddhism, a very old and profound spiritual tradition, is based on philosophical insights that clarify the nature of existence and provide guidance for living morally in a meaningful way. In this article, we will look at two central concepts in Buddhist philosophy: The Four Noble Truths and The Mahayana Ideal. These teachings are foundational to Buddhism and help us understand suffering as well as foster compassion for all beings.

The Four Noble Truths: Foundation of Buddhist PhilosophyThe Four Noble Truths are considered the Buddha’s first and most important teachings when he was known as Siddhartha Gautama. This set of ideas serves as the basis for all Buddhist thought by offering a deep understanding of human life and how to be free from suffering.

The First Noble Truth (Dukkha)The initial Noble Truth recognizes that suffering (dukkha) is an integral part of human existence. Suffering includes physical pain but also mental distress, dissatisfaction with life or things as they are and even more broadly speaking – the unfulfilling nature of everything is impermanent. Buddhism teaches us that we suffer because we cling to fleeting experiences which can never satisfy our desires; this is caused by Anica or impermanence whereby worldly events lack importance thus making them unable to bring lasting happiness.

Buddhist Chanting and Music in Various Traditions the Function of Music in Different Buddhist Traditions

Buddhism is a philosophical set of teachings that originated from Siddhartha Gautama who was known as Buddha. Buddhism is over 2,500 years old and it aims at relieving pain as well as the development of the mind. Of all these different practices music and chanting are especially important in different schools of Buddhism. This article is aimed at explaining the occurrence of music and chanting in the context of Buddhism as well as the multifunctional character of the latter.

Buddhist prayer: Concept of music and chantingMusic and chanting in Buddhism are used for a variety of purposes: for providing devotional practices, for ritual, for meditation, as well as for education. These elements are not purely artistic expressions but are rather related to the spiritual goals of the subject. They can be used as a meditation tool, evoke spiritual states, pass the information, and make the audience united.

Theravāda Tradition: Simplicity and DevotionTheravada Buddhism is popular in Sri Lanka Thailand and Myanmar and general is quite conservative as it follows the early texts that were written. The chanting is a major practice in this branch as compared to the music which is rather minimal as compared to others.

दिगम्बर जैन धर्म के दो प्रमुख मतों में से एक है, जिनके धार्मिक मुनि कोई वस्त्र नहीं पहनते और संपत्ति को त्याग देते है।

श्वेताम्बर' नामक दूसरे मत के मुनि सफ़ेद कपड़े पहनते हैं। मध्यकालीन भारत में दिगम्बरों का पर्याप्त प्रभाव था।